Specialty Coverage · Gastroenterology

Procedure revenue, coded with clinical precision.

Authorization-heavy schedules. Pathology that arrives after the claim is due. Screening rules that change the same code from covered to denied. Clientele runs the procedure intelligence layer built specifically for GI.

Screening & Surveillance Advanced Endoscopy Pathology Integration Prior Authorization ASC Billing
HIPAA compliant SOC 2 Type II Certified coders (CPC, CGSC)
GASTROENTEROLOGY
Procedure workflow
Live
SCHEDULED TODAY
14
AUTH CLEARED
100%
Colonoscopy EGD ERCP
CODING SUGGESTION
45385 + 33 supported by pathology
Billing readiness 97%
REFERRAL QUEUE
6 new today
ELIGIBILITY
Verified · 41 today
PRE-AUTHORIZATION
0 pending
ENDOSCOPY SCHEDULE
3 suites · full
PATHOLOGY RESULTS
2 pending read
CLAIMS
Scrubbed · 0 edits
PROCEDURE COMPLEXITY

Eight procedure types. One revenue intelligence layer.

Screening, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures each carry different coverage rules, often for the same code.

GI Revenue Intelligence
8 connected procedure types
Colonoscopy
Screening → therapeutic
Upper GI
EGD + biopsy logic
ERCP
Technique-specific
Capsule Endoscopy
Interpretation-billed
Pathology
Diagnosis-linked
Biopsy
Add-on code logic
Screening
PT / 33 modifier
Surveillance
Interval-tracked
ENDOSCOPY JOURNEY

Follow one procedure from referral to payment.

AUTHORIZATION-DRIVEN LEAKAGE
8–13% of net
STEP 1
Referral
INTAKE

Referring provider and reason captured; history pulled for medical necessity.

STEP 2
Insurance Verification
LEAK POINT

Screening versus diagnostic benefit confirmed before the visit is scheduled.

STEP 3
Authorization
LEAK POINT

Payer-specific requirements cleared before the procedure hits the schedule.

STEP 4
Procedure
LEAK POINT

Technique, findings and add-ons captured at the level actually performed.

STEP 5
Pathology
LEAK POINT

Biopsy results matched to the encounter; coding holds for the final read.

STEP 6
Documentation
LEAK POINT

Operative note checked for the detail the code set requires.

STEP 7
Coding
LEAK POINT

Modifier and screening-conversion logic applied before submission.

STEP 8
Claim
LEAK POINT

Payer-specific procedure and pathology edits cleared pre-submission.

STEP 9
Payment
RECOVERED

What actually lands in the account after authorization-aware review.

CLIENTELE GI INTELLIGENCE

A dashboard for every procedure, before the claim goes out.

Six governance modules run on every encounter, from authorization through denial prevention.

clientele / gastroenterology / governance All systems nominal
MODULE 01 Active

Authorization Engine

Payer-specific requirements tracked from the day a procedure is scheduled.

AUTH SUCCESS 99.2%
MODULE 02 Active

Procedure Coding

Technique, findings and add-ons coded to the specific procedure performed.

CODING ACCURACY 97.4%
MODULE 03 Active

Pathology Integration

Coding waits for the final pathology read so the diagnosis matches the biopsy.

MATCHED TO ENCOUNTER 100%
MODULE 04 Reviewing

Modifier Validation

PT, 33, 59 and 22 sequencing checked against payer-specific edit sets.

MODIFIER ACCURACY 96.8%
MODULE 05 Active

Medical Necessity

Diagnosis and symptom history checked against payer coverage policy before scheduling.

POLICY MATCH 98.1%
MODULE 06

Denial Prevention

Every denial pattern from the last claim run is fed back into the edit set before the next batch.

−29% denial rate quarter over quarter
PROCEDURE ANALYTICS

Every suite, every schedule, one live view.

Procedure volume, authorization status and revenue trend, updated as the schedule moves.

PROCEDURE VOLUME
312 / wk
AUTHORIZATION STATUS
99.2%
CODING ACCURACY
97.4%
CLAIM QUEUE
18 open
Procedure Analytics Gastroenterology · 3 endoscopy suites Updated 2 min ago
REVENUE TREND +19.6%
$687K / mo
CLAIM QUEUE
Ready to submit 241
Awaiting pathology 12
Needs review 6
High denial risk 3
PATHOLOGY INTEGRATION

2 biopsy reads pending; coding holds automatically until the final diagnosis posts.

Avg. turnaround 1.8 days
DENIAL PREDICTION
Approved-likely 84% High risk 5%
CLIENTELE AI

Six checks, one continuous pipeline.

Every GI claim moves through the same intelligence chain before it reaches a payer.

1 Procedure Detection
2 Coding Suggestions
3 Documentation Review
4 Claim Validation
5 Revenue Intelligence
6 Appeal Prediction

312 procedures a week flowing through all six checks, average time in pipeline: 44 seconds.

PERFORMANCE

Measured across GI clients, trailing four quarters.

0%
Procedure accuracy
Technique and findings coded to the specific procedure.
0%
Authorization success
Cleared before the procedure reaches the schedule.
0%
Clean claims
First-pass acceptance across all GI payers.
+0%
Revenue growth
Average lift across GI clients in the trailing year.
GI SERVICES MAP

One coding team, every GI service line.

Gastroenterology
Screening
Preventive benefit logic
Advanced Procedures
ERCP, EUS
Therapeutic GI
Intervention-coded
Inflammatory Disease
IBD panel management
Liver Care
Chronic disease coding
Motility
Functional testing
IN THEIR WORDS

Gastroenterologists and revenue leaders.

"

Pathology results used to sit in a fax queue. Now they drive the code before the biller even opens the chart.

Gastroenterologist
GI Associates · Tennessee
"

Our ASC stopped losing screening colonoscopies to authorization delays.

Practice Administrator
Ambulatory Surgery Center · Colorado
"

Finally a partner that codes a therapeutic EGD differently than a diagnostic one, consistently.

Revenue Cycle Director
Multi-provider GI Group · Michigan
FAQ

Questions from GI practices.

When a screening colonoscopy becomes diagnostic or therapeutic mid-procedure, we apply the correct modifier (PT for Medicare, 33 for commercial) so the patient's preventive benefit is preserved and the claim reflects what was actually done.

Pathology results are matched to the originating encounter automatically. Coding waits for the final read on biopsies so the diagnosis code reflects the pathology, not just the endoscopic impression.

Yes. Our coders hold GI-specific credentials and code ERCP, EUS, capsule and balloon-assisted procedures to the specific technique and findings, not a generic upper endoscopy code.

Authorization status is tracked from the day a procedure is scheduled, with payer-specific requirements flagged automatically so nothing reaches the schedule unauthorized.

Yes. Site of service changes both the code set and the modifier logic, and we apply the correct set automatically based on where the procedure is performed.

A percentage of net collections with contracted clean-claim and authorization-success targets. No implementation fee, and month-to-month after the first year.

Gastroenterology onboarding in 21 days

Precision coding for every procedure on the schedule.

Send us 90 days of claims and pathology data. We will show you exactly where authorization delays and modifier errors are costing your practice, before you sign anything.

No implementation fee Works with your existing EHR Month-to-month after year one